Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Top Posters

Who's Online (2)

Powered by Vanilla. Made with Bootstrap.
Anyone agree with this?
  • i saw mention of viruses and coding them on here as of late. do any of you agree with me, that the days of real, true, damaging viruses are over? think about it. since the beginning of 2000, how many real hardcore viruses have you seen out there that are not just more forms of shitty propogation worms or annoying spy/malware?! i get upset everytime i hear "you better scan yourself for viruses or else" blah blah. i have yet to ever be infected with anything that can even be considered "serious". if you want to know a true virus that actually could take out a pc, go read up on the Chernobyl virus. how many virus' out there besides the new Stuxxnet actually attack at the hardware layer? how many out there write your MBR/hardrive to zeroes?

    like i said, most of the crap out there now is boring, predictable malware garbage that can be easily detected with Process Explorer, then extrapolated. i doubt you will really see anything of substance from virus writers out there today. all they care about is spam/email propogation and infecting you with more ads saying "clean your registry or else". if you don't agree--that's fine
  • Sh3llc0d3
    Posts: 1,910
    Erm... I disagree partly. I think we will begin seeing a growth/boom in viruses your on about in the coming year. There has been a decrease in severe viruses that are of major public interest but it doesn't mean it doesn't happen. The malware we see at the moment (aside from ad-shite malware) still pose a very real threat in terms of ID theft, stealing information/IDs is a lot more lucrative than damaging systems. However cyberattacks in such mediums as the 'hardcore' virus will become more popular I think.

    I do agree it has declined for the moment.
  • i think my main point i was driving home is that, sure, viruses out there now are still a threat, but as far as actual damage, you don't see anything like we saw w/ Chernobyl. agreed? how many anomolies out there do you see right now that are hardware attack based (besides stuxxnet)? i actually don't see hardware attacks being targeted in the future, either, simply becvause of the protection schemes that are now in place on chipsets/etc

    i truly don't think anything can top what Chernobyl did in '98 in terms of actual pc "damage". i mean, after the second payload was launched and flashed your BIOS to nil, back then you basically had a paperweight (your MOBO was useless)
  • Quite true, but yet untrue. Viruses can still be damaging. Many people just think of viruses as keyloggers and RAT's, which are for skids and lazy fucks who can't code. And both aren't very damaging. And as for hardware attacks, I'm looking to implement that into the iVirus(Along with victims email spreading, for some extra damage).
  • quickly, since you seem to be the only one responding to me here---

    what do you think of the term "hacker" being thrown around everywhere these days? hell, i turn on CNN , and those dopes are talking about the cyber-attacks that Wiki-leaks is carrying out. they seem to think it takes alot of skill to point a mass array of zombie bots in a servers direction and hit the SEND button! you have to be kidding me! the term has been so loosely thrown about these days, i tell myself i want no part of that label. i don't deserve the title myself, simply because i feel my skills are not even on that level. i am still an intermediate network geek. when you can write your own shellcode and can set up an elaborate network scheme (and can also secure it AND break it when you need to), then i feel you have earned that title. kids who copy/paste code from notepad and tweak 2 lines then slap their names to it are not hacking anything. nor is the user who hits the auto-pwn button on his metasploit while blindly having his back turned drinking a kool-aid. do you get what i am saying? where is the skill involved in todays "hacking"? i fnd alot of show and none of the go
  • said:


    quickly, since you seem to be the only one responding to me here---

    what do you think of the term "hacker" being thrown around everywhere these days? hell, i turn on CNN , and those dopes are talking about the cyber-attacks that Wiki-leaks is carrying out. they seem to think it takes alot of skill to point a mass array of zombie bots in a servers direction and hit the SEND button! you have to be kidding me! the term has been so loosely thrown about these days, i tell myself i want no part of that label. i don't deserve the title myself, simply because i feel my skills are not even on that level. i am still an intermediate network geek. when you can write your own shellcode and can set up an elaborate network scheme (and can also secure it AND break it when you need to), then i feel you have earned that title. kids who copy/paste code from notepad and tweak 2 lines then slap their names to it are not hacking anything. nor is the user who hits the auto-pwn button on his metasploit while blindly having his back turned drinking a kool-aid. do you get what i am saying? where is the skill involved in todays "hacking"? i fnd alot of show and none of the go


    Heh. Don't even get me started on that one. I hate it when skids are referred to as hackers, when all they do is press buttons. Real hackers are very hard to come by these days, and none of them call themselves hackers, so you never know. As for autopwn, it is very skiddish, but not as skiddish as RAT's, so its for absolute beginners, but its still not hacking what-so-ever.
  • so do you agree with me that the future of hacking---the fact it is now so damn automated and easy, is actually detrimental to the real art? it seems the VAS and Metasploits of the world can turn ANYONE into a "hacker". yes, that angers me. no one these days even knows when they root a server, how they even did it! sure, you have the shellcode sitting in front of you as a Metasploit module, but how many dopey kids out there even know what the hell those lines of code even did!?

    the best example is when you have people scanning you using nmap or whatever scanner. they will sit there and go after you for a good 5 minutes, then throw their hands up and say "he must be blocking me"

    the fact you don't even watch your traffic as you scan proves to me right there you are a fool with no clue! you watch the traffic as you scan so you can instantly see if you are being filtered (usually in the first 5 seconds)

    it is simple COMMON SENSE approaches like this that seem to no longer be in use anymore. we have things now on such an automated level, we simply hand our tasks over to some massive exploit program/scanner while we sit back and reap the rewards. this is not "hacking". sure, you can learn alot from it and yes, in the business world, time is money, so you need to have tasks automated. but PLEASE, do not call any of this shit hacking! this message is mainly directed at the dopey idiots on CNN who think a damn DoS attack is earth-shattering and "terrorizing"--enough to add fame for some pimple-faced 15 year old who fired off the FLOOD button!

    hopefully i am not the only voice on here who sees it this way, speak up for the true art!
  • sangf
    Posts: 203
    mmmm.. personally, i don't care about the label "hacker", and what other people do under the guise of it - i also don't see a reason to resent someone for being less skilled - that's just elitist. learning to do something objectively is perfectly fine with me, the world would be a boring place if we all followed the invisible guidelines of a hyped up label to define our skills under it. but alas, the "scene" has undeniably changed, that's just computing for you. automation is a benefit - but we're in times where so many people know how to code, that it's simply natural to expect a GUI version of any semi-popular command-line tool. as far as talent stands though, i actually think there's more talented people currently - a completely baseless thought, but hey, that's just my 0.02$.
  • I think that with the sale of the stuxxnet code we will see more terrorists turning to this radical "hardcore" virii to get there message through and we all know that America is probably going to be the target. Just because they aren't in the news or out there doesn't mean they are being coded by people who live in their mothers basements.



    NOTES ABOUT POST:

    1. Virii is the plural of virus
    2. All nerds live in their mother basements.
  • Sh3llc0d3
    Posts: 1,910
    Virii is the slang usage for the plural of virus, mostly used by computing professionals to distinguish from medical viruses in virology/immunological fields.

    Viruses is the plural: http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/virus

    http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=virii
    http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/virii

    Most english graduates would say viruses is the natural plural based on the latin.
  • Xin
    Posts: 3,251
    Never heard of stuxnet, Zeus, Spyeye and some of the newer breeds? Yeah anything you see on Hackhound, hackforums and openwc i agree but linger in these russian forums and you get some serious stuff.
    Xin
  • Sh3llc0d3
    Posts: 1,910
    ~Moved~
    Questions, Suggestions & Feedback --> Malware