iExploit

Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Sign In Apply for Membership

Top Posters

Who's Online (1)

Powered by Vanilla. Made with Bootstrap.
Looking to introduce yourself? Look no further, and click here! We also have IRC! [irc.evilzone.org #iexploit]
Ping Of Death [Works]
  • Prariredog
    Posts: 14
    Run in .bat
    @echo
    :1
    ping -n [HOW BIG PACKETS SEND 200 300 EG] [IP/WEBSITE]
    /C
    goto :1
    @echo off

    edit -n [insert how much u want to be sent]

    Download:
    DDOSATTACK
    Create Shortcut and hit edit then edit it.

    VirusTOTAL:
    None
    VirusTotalScan
  • chroniccommand
    Posts: 1,389
    Also known as the Ping of Death. Doesn't work much now a days. Would need a LOT of those from different machines.
  • Prariredog
    Posts: 14
    said:


    Also known as the Ping of Death. Doesn't work much now a days. Would need a LOT of those from different machines.



    Works great for swf servers going off of links for objects etc...
  • chroniccommand
    Posts: 1,389
    said:


    said:


    Also known as the Ping of Death. Doesn't work much now a days. Would need a LOT of those from different machines.



    Works great for swf servers going off of links for objects etc...


    ....Wat.
  • Corrosion
    Posts: 121
    it'll kill a win98 machine :)
  • Prariredog
    Posts: 14
    said:



    ....Wat.




    Lets say WOW *World of warcraft*
    The server has data that goes from pictures lets say
    Those pictures can be WOW's server
  • m0rph
    Posts: 332
    said:


    Lets say WOW *World of warcraft*
    The server has data that goes from pictures lets say
    Those pictures can be WOW's server


    ............Wat?

    This makes no sense at all.

    Now, if you were sending SYN packets, and not sending the 3rd handshake (ACK packets), that would make a little more sense, because that would leave the server waiting for an ACK packet even if it didn't receive one (RXbot, anyone?). If you do it enough times that would leave the server waiting for many different ACK's from you, possibly denying someone else the possibility of even receiving a SYN-ACK. But, completing the full 3-way handshake does nothing except waste resources...mainly yours.


    I just had an idea, it's more of a local network attack, but imagine broadcasting FIN packets to everyone while spoofing the IP of say the main gateway, hell you could probably do it through arp too. That'd be an alright internal dos, no?

    I'll have to play around with this idea. Of course that will take a lot of time.
    while( !(succeed = try() ) );
  • mandi
    Posts: 207
    To my knowledge this Attack has been patched before many years,This wont works on xp,vista,7 or any of the other modern editions,it will work on windows 98.
  • chroniccommand
    Posts: 1,389
    A ping is a simple network lookup. This won't work anymore now that networking has evolved. More advanced techniques need to be used.
  • Sh3llc0d3
    Posts: 1,910
    I think we've established this is outdated post-win98 3 times now, its a ping of death ...it does what it says on the tin. The tin just happens to be out of date :)
  • Xin
    Posts: 3,251
    Sorry to disappoint, we are not in 1990, this wouldnt even slow a website, it is simply jamming your connection if you experience any slowness , not the servers.
    Xin
  • McKittrick
    Posts: 194
    "This makes no sense at all.

    Now, if you were sending SYN packets, and not sending the 3rd handshake (ACK packets), that would make a little more sense, because that would leave the server waiting for an ACK packet even if it didn't receive one (RXbot, anyone?). If you do it enough times that would leave the server waiting for many different ACK's from you, possibly denying someone else the possibility of even receiving a SYN-ACK. But, completing the full 3-way handshake does nothing except waste resources...mainly yours."

    the above was patched years ago. known as a SYN flood and was rather common. you simply had a poor buffer timeout level for socket ques. same thing with "POD". this shit is old news! and a ping is not a "network lookup". LOL! wouldn't that be more DNS than anything!? a ping is a simple test packet akin to sonar (hello--------hello back)


    also, if you sent a FIN flag packet, most stacks would drop it since you have no SYN bit set. hell even a SYN/FIN scan will get dropped
  • Prariredog
    Posts: 14
    Haha I found low orbit Ion cannon without a virus and it works It has no virus and when I used peerblock it sends the ip 192.168.1.103:PORTNUMBER to that person testing it might upload this one instead[hr]
    Going 2 clean my system now[hr]
    Hmm going to work a summer project ._.
  • undead
    Posts: 822
    How do you say "Works"? Did you try this and it worked? lol
  • volvo14
    Posts: 18
    PinG....Work ....PonG
    very old information !!!
Add a Comment